The Campa Cola illegal structure -
The Supreme Court had ordered demolition of the illegal floors on February 27 and said the residents could not approach a government or a political body for regularization of the structures.
The Supreme Court had ordered demolition of the illegal floors on February 27 and said the residents could not approach a government or a political body for regularization of the structures.
The
Supreme Court however, had given a stay for the demolition on May 2 and
had given the residents five months to vacate. The Bombay High Court on
September 26 dismissed a writ petition by the residents of Campa Cola
compound seeking regularisation of 35 illegal floors.
However,
after pleading the Supreme Court for allowing them to go to BMC for
retaining the area which they could, the Court has denied all the pleads
and has extended the demolition till November 11.
In
the calm of despair, they are even unhappy with the Supreme Court’s
extension of the earlier demolition date of October 1 to November 11, as
they don’t wish to live so long in fear and anxiety.
Almost
40 per cent of the residents in the 96 doomed flats have already moved
out, some returning to their native places, or to live with their
children. The rest, who are still staying in the upper floors of the
seven buildings, are now praying for a miracle in the form of a
government intervention, as they have nowhere to go and cannot afford to
pay the rent in Worli area.
Court orders
The Supreme Court had ordered demolition of the illegal floors of the Campa Cola buildings on February 27 and prohibited residents from approaching any government or political body for regularising the structures. The SC, however, relented and passed a stay order on May 2, giving residents five months time to vacate.
On
September 26, the High Court had dismissed a writ petition by the
residents, seeking the regularisation of the 35 illegal floors. But
after much pleading with the SC to allow them to approach the BMC for
getting hold of the retainable area, the SC put off the demolition to
November 11.
Total number of floors to be demolished from the seven buildings
Stacking up the numbers
Of the seven buildings facing partial demolition:
2 have 17 and 20 floors respectively
2 have 7 floors
3 have 6 floors
Of the seven buildings facing partial demolition:
2 have 17 and 20 floors respectively
2 have 7 floors
3 have 6 floors
The Campa Cola Case
When the Supreme Court ordered
the illegal floors of the buildings in Worli’s Campa Cola compound to
be demolished, people across the city must have felt a fraction of the
residents’ shock. This is the sort of thing that happens routinely to
slum dwellers, not to folks living in Worli, not to “people like us”.
Even though millions of people like us live in illegal buildings that
could, by a quirk of circumstance, face a similar tragedy.
The
Campa Cola residents are both victims and participants in an irony that
plays out all too frequently in Mumbai. In the 1980s, three builders
constructed seven buildings on a plot that previously housed a factory
owned by Pure Drinks. Despite having permission to build only six
floors, the builders erected many more—one building has 17 floors,
another has 20. One of the builders, B. K. Gupta, conveniently pinning
the blame on the Brihanmumbai Municipal Corporation. Gupta, who is now
bedridden, says that it was understood that builders would exceed the
permissible height and that the civic authorities would regularise the
extra floors after charging penalties. Even though the BMC issued “stop
work notices” between 1984 and 1989, it did nothing to actually prevent
the illegal floors from being built and even collected penalties. As
Gupta so aptly pointed out in a statement that can be applied to
Mumbai’s real estate crisis, “It was a breach but legally approvable.”
The
BMC had in fact promised to regularise the illegal floors in 1987.
Rohit Malhotra, a resident since 1987 who’s been acting as spokesperson
for those facing eviction, says that the civic body had agreed to
regularise 67,000 square feet. It’s not known why the BMC didn’t go
ahead. The same corporation is today tasked with the demolition of the
illegal floors that it wilfully ignored. As is always the case with
illegal constructions, it’s the residents who suffer. Like the folks who
died and lost their families when a cheaply constructed, illegal
building crashed in Mumbra on Thursday, April 4. For once, the
bureaucrats who colluded with the builders were arrested.
But residents are not always entirely above blame. The 140 affected families claim that they had no clue(THIS IS NOT TRUE) (IGNORANCE OF LAW IS NO EXCUSE)that
their floors were illegal. “It was a complete bolt from the blue,” One
of the resident says. “The biggest bolt was that that BMC insisted (on
evicting us) within 48 hours.” The demolition, which was supposed to
begin on Thursday, May 2, has since been postponed by the Supreme Court
by five months. It was only in 2000, Malhotra says, that the residents
found out that the buildings had not been given an occupation certificate by the BMC.(OC) However,
moving into a building without the certificate is illegal and buyers
should make sure the builders have it before they purchase a flat by
asking to see it. In 1986, buyers were told that the building plans had
been approved. But they hadn’t been, which is why the buildings had no
water connection. For all these years, the residents have relied on
tanker water. They applied for a water connection in 1999 but it was
only in 2005 that they learned they were living in illegally constructed apartments.
It’s
a vicious cycle. Builders collude with politicians and the BMC to
construct buildings illegally. Perhaps tempted by a good deal, buyers
overlook the irregularities. Given Mumbai’s skewed real estate market
where a 476 square feet MHADA flat costs Rs55 lakh, it’s not hard to
sympathise with desperate flat buyers who naively or knowingly invest in
properties that aren’t entirely legal and then have faith that the same
system that allowed the buildings to come up will regularise them. When
building violations are found out and flat owners are threatened with
eviction, politicians lobby to regularise the buildings in order gain
brownie points with their vote banks. When they get away with it,
builders are encouraged. If the BMC were to take action against every
unauthorised construction, then vast swathes of the city, especially the
western suburbs, Thane and Ulhasnagar, would be emptied.
So
the Campa Cola case is unlikely to be a deterrent for builders and
buyers in the future. Like Pratibha building in the Sophia College
Lane, which remains a shell of a building after eight illegal floors
were demolished in the early 1990s, Campa Cola will be an ephemeral
cautionary tale at the most. What’s needed of course is an effective
means to keep track of building plans and permissions. This would open
builders and the BMC to greater scrutiny and buyers would no longer be
able to plead ignorance while purchasing flats. Recently the BMC
announced that it was considering putting the plans of buildings online
so that buyers can keep tabs on their investments. But since making the
relationship between builders and the civic authority transparent is not
in the best interest of corrupt officials, it won’t be a surprise if
such a website remains only a plan on paper. In which case, breaches can
continue to be “legally approvable”.
1)
Why is no action taken against the BMC to permit construction of
illegal floors. It is obvious that construction of 7 building in campa
cola compound cannot be undertaken overnight. It therefore means that
the BMC had turned a blind eye during the construction period.
2)
Further, the decision by supreme court asking residents to evacuate
campa ccola compounds, effectively means that builders can go scot free
after constructing illegal structures. Why is no penalty or action taken
against builder lobby?
how come govt collect stamp duty & registration for the unauthorised flats, can’t they check before registering before it?
& these politicians fighting for slums & giving them flats under SRA type of scheme by pinching the pockets of tax payers, which is common man, whose flat will be demolished.
my advice to all, don’t buy unauthorised flats, built slums, that will never broken.
Social worker Medha patkar & politicians will surely stand by you.
& these politicians fighting for slums & giving them flats under SRA type of scheme by pinching the pockets of tax payers, which is common man, whose flat will be demolished.
my advice to all, don’t buy unauthorised flats, built slums, that will never broken.
Social worker Medha patkar & politicians will surely stand by you.
SUPREME
COURT OR ANY COURT OF LAW, MUST FOCUS AND UNDERSTAND THAT A COMMON MAN
DOES NOT HAVE ANY KNOWLDGE OF IOD/CC/OCC ETC., SO HE MUST NOT BE
PUNISHED. IT IS BUILDER, MCGM OFFICERS, ARCHITECT, STATE GOVERNMENT(WHO
TAKE STAMP DUTY – BLINDLY – AS IF SELLING COUNTRY IN THE HANDS OF
TERORIST) ELECTRICTY DEPT. ETC WHO GIVE ALL HELP TO BUILDER. A COMMON
MAN VISIT BUILDING AND PURCHASE PROPERTY. HOW HE CAN COME TO KNOW HOW
BUILDING WAS DEVELOPED.
IF
WE CARRY OUT A SMALL WORK IN OUR SMALL SHOP OR ROOM AND TINY
DEBRIS/STONE ETC KEPT OUTSIDE ON THE ROAD OR GALLI, IMMEDIATLY A MCGM
PERSON COME, TORTURE US, THREATEN US TO STOP WORK, TAKE NECESSARY AMOUNT
AND GO. MEANS A SINGLE LEAF OF TREE CAN NOT REMAIN OR COME WITHOUT THE
KNOWLDGE OF MCGM, THAN HOW 8 OR 10 OR 12 FLOOR CAN BE BUILD IN ANY
BUILDING.
MCGM
OFFICERS WHO ARE SEATING IN A.C. OFFICES SHOULD REGULARLY VISIT EACH
AND EVRY SITE UNDER THEIR JURISDICTION, WHILE ISSUEING IOD/CC OR LIKE
THINGS, THEY MUST ISSUE NOTICE STOP WORK NOTICE, ALSO GIVE IN PRESS,
MEDIA, PUT A BOARD IN WRITING IN FRONT OF BUILDING, IF ANY UNAUTHORISED
CONSTRUCTIONS IS CONTINUED. ONE OR TWO FLOOR IN ANY NEW CONSTRUCTIONS IS
NOT BUILDING IN TWO OR THREE DAYS IT TAKE TIME AND MCGM OFFICER CAN
VERY WELL CATCH ANY CONSTRUCTION BEYOND APPROVE LEVEL.
Blogs,
Facebook campaign seeking support, appeals to chief minister for
issuing an ordinance, residents of Campa Cola Compound are doing all
these to stop demolition of their homes. All these net and bolts may not
work in favour of those sitting in armchairs and posting requests and
passing remarks. The Supreme court orders have to be complied with.
The demolition of illegal floors of the seven buildings in the Campa Cola Compound will be held on November 2.
Fearing
contempt of the court, residents are not speaking on record but have
vented their anger against the builder and the civic body on the social
networking media. They have argued how the government and the
Brihanmumbai Municipal Corporation (BMC) could charge taxes and stamp
duty of the building which was illegal. Now, the residents are hoping
for a miracle.
The
apartments in the Campa Cola Compound were constructed on a land leased
in 1955 to Pure Drinks Ltd, which was later permitted by the BMC in
1980 to build residential apartments.
Pure Drinks and three builders went on to build seven apartments, two of which were high-rises of 20 and 17 floors.
Seven
high-rise buildings were constructed between 1981 and 1989. While the
builders were granted permission for ground-plus-five floors, some of
the constructions were built with extra floors. The buildings are
Midtown Apartments (20 floors), Esha-Ekta Apartments (8 floors), Shubh
Apartments (7 floors), Patel Apartments (two buildings, 6 floors each),
BY Apartments (6 floors), and Orchid (17 floors).
Under
the Coastal Regulatory Zone (CRZ) rules in force at the time, the
illegal built-up area totaled to about 91,000 sq ft. According to the
plan worked out by the residents, they proposed to compensate 19 flat
owners, forgoing about 24,000 sq ft, if the BMC agreed to regularise the
remainder 67,000 sq ft of the 83 flats.
Although
the civic administration had ordered the builders to stop the
construction work, they continued with it after paying fines. The
residents, who bought houses more than 20 years ago, say they were
unaware that the construction violated BMC norms.
The
owners of 102 flats living on the floors that are to be demolished had
planned to get 83 of the flats regularised by the civic body and
compensate the owners of the remaining 19 flats to settle the FSI issue.
7 high-rises with illegal floors
Seven high-rise buildings were constructed between 1981 and 1989 in the Campa Cola Compound. While the builders were granted permission for ground-plus-five floors, some of the constructions were built with extra floors. The buildings are Midtown Apartments (20 floors), Esha-Ekta Apartments (8 floors), Shubh Apartments (7 floors), Patel Apartments (two buildings, 6 floors each), BY Apartments (6 floors), and Orchid (17 floors).
Seven high-rise buildings were constructed between 1981 and 1989 in the Campa Cola Compound. While the builders were granted permission for ground-plus-five floors, some of the constructions were built with extra floors. The buildings are Midtown Apartments (20 floors), Esha-Ekta Apartments (8 floors), Shubh Apartments (7 floors), Patel Apartments (two buildings, 6 floors each), BY Apartments (6 floors), and Orchid (17 floors).
If
you are planning to buy a house, make sure your building is legitimate
by obtaining the ‘legality certificates’ or your fate my end up as the
unfortunate residents of Campa Cola building in Worli. A report in
today’s Times of India says that residents of Campa Cola that are
staying in the illegally constructed floors will have to cough up Rs 1.9
crore— the estimated cost of demolition. Not only will they lose their
homes, but one wonders how they will garner this amount as they don’t
even have enough funds for the legal battle. Residents of Campa Cola
Society in Mumbai Residents of Campa Cola Society in Mumbai In February,
the Supreme Court had ordered the demolition of the illegal floors of
buildings in the Campa Cola compound. These buildings included Midtown,
Esha Ekta Apartments, Shubh Apartments, Patel Apartments, B Y Apartments
and Orchid. While the builders were given permission to construct only
ground-plus-five floors, Midtown ended up having 20 floors, Orchid 17,
Esha Ekta and Shubh eight, BY seven, and two wings of Patel six floors
each. That the developer had not obtained the required permissions came
to light only in 2005, after the occupants had been living at the
compound for two decades. In May, the 140 families residing on the 35
illegal floors again moved the Supreme Court claiming that they had no
idea their floors were constructed illegally. However, the SC upheld its
order but granted them six months reprieve to vacate flats. Though, the
residents had earlier expressed their intend to move a review petition
in the Supreme Court, the Bombay High Court had in July said that the
residents cannot regularise an illegal structure by buying additional
FSI.
Many
residents of Campa Cola compound in Mumbai's Worli, whose illegal flats
were to be pulled down by Civic Authorities on Thursday, are angry and
frustrated even after the Supreme Court extended the deadline for
demolishing the 140 flats in the housing society.
But
like residents of 35 illegal floors, he does not have an Occupation
Certificate. Their eight year struggle to regularise their flats has
yielded nothing.
No comments:
Post a Comment