The next destination is
MYSORE.
Mysore-the capital of
the erstwhile Mysore kingdom which was transferred from Srirangapatana to the
present city of Mysore after the fall of Tipu Sultan in the 4th Anglo-Mysore
war in 1799, one of the British Commissioners noted: “Mysore, the headquarters
of the district and the capital of the province, has a population of 73,000 and
is, therefore, a considerable place, but is badly situated, and were it not for
its being the seat of Sovereign, would soon lose the factitious importance that
it now possesses … there are few good houses in the town, the majority being
constructed of wattle and mud, while the Raja’s palace within the fort can
scarcely be considered worthy of the name.” (T.P. Issar in The Royal
City)
But within a span of 60
to 70 years during the regime of the later Wadiyars, notably Chamarajendra
Wadiyar IX (1881-94) and Krishnarajendra Wadiyar IV (1902-40), Mysore emerged
as a model city. Public buildings such as the Town Hall (1884), Maharaja’s
Sanskrit College (1880s), the Oriental Research Institute (1891), Maharaja’s
College (1889) and the law courts (1895), apart from palaces such as the
Jayalakshmi Vilas Mansion (1905), Cheluvamba Vilas (1910), which now houses the
Central Food Technology Research Institute, the Amba Vilas Palace (1911-12) and
the Lalitha Mahal Palace (1921) came to adorn the city skyline, along with
well-planned layouts, enhancing its aesthetic beauty.
The establishment of the
University of Mysore in 1916 led to the setting up of many other educational
institutions and Mysore’s reputation as a centre for learning grew — more so
under the later Wadiyars and their equally far-sighted Diwans; notably Diwan
Seshadri Iyer, Sir M. Visvesvaraya and Diwan Mirza Ismail.
But after Independence,
when the capital shifted to Bangalore and the democratically elected government
replaced the institution of the Maharajas, Mysore’s importance declined. As
Bangalore built on its vast industrial base established after Independence and
emerged as an international IT hub and the Silicon Valley of India, the glory
of Mysore was restricted to how it fared on the tourism front.
But in recent years the
spill-over effect of Bangalore has had its impact on Mysore. The saturation of
Bangalore, the skyrocketing real estate prices and unbridled growth and chaos
have forced the government and even corporates to disperse and expand outside
the capital city. And Mysore, with a population of a million-plus, is emerging
as a preferred choice with its advantages of proximity to Bangalore, easy pace
of life devoid of congestion and pollution and land availability at affordable
rates, which translates into reduced operating and overhead costs for
industries, cheap labour and a lower attrition rate.
This has attracted new
investment from companies such as Infosys, which has developed the world’s
largest corporate training centre on its Mysore campus. While investment from
other IT or manufacturing majors are slow to come by, the city has spawned many
start-ups in the IT and ITES sector, while it is increasingly being recognised
as an electronic hardware manufacturing hub.
The software exports
from Mysore was estimated at Rs. 2500 crore last fiscal, though it is dwarfed
by Bangalore’s exports in excess of Rs. 1,00,000 crore. Mysore’s nearest
competitor on the IT front among other Tier 2 cities is Bhubaneshwar with
exports amounting to roughly Rs. 1,300 crore during the last financial year.
Hence, Mysore is not lagging behind, say stakeholders.
The slow but steady
expansion of industry has resulted in a perceptible demographic change in the
city’s worker profile. Suresh Kumar Jain, general secretary of the Mysore
Industries Association, says the city is attracting a trained and talented workforce,
though not on the scale of Bangalore where the pay is higher.
Regional sentiment
But at another level, it
has led to tensions at the grassroots level with proliferation of outfits
seeking priority for local people in employment. Though on the fringes, those
outfits occasionally threaten to disrupt the social harmony for which Mysore is
known; the perceived anti-Kannada stance of the director of a leading research
institute who was roughed up some time ago is a case in point. Since these
outfits claim to espouse the cause of Kannada, politicians prefer not to take
them on.
The urbanisation trends
in Mysore have been backed by the growth of the service sector and penetration
of financial institutions. Major players in real estate development have promoted
Mysore as a “second home option”, which has found favour with investors with
deep pockets from other cities. As a result, the real estate prices have
increased in the past 10 years and are out of bounds of the local people and
the salaried middle class. The city’s horizontal sprawl has consumed open
spaces and even threatens the Chamundi Hills while commuting distance has
increased from the suburbs to the city-centre. This has led to proliferation of
apartments and vertical growth in a city which till recently was known for row
houses and independent bungalows. The completion of the track doubling work
between Mysore and Bangalore and conversion of the road between the two cities
into a six-lane highway will reduce the commuting time and hasten the urbanisation
process.
Heritage conservation
challenges
But amid this churning, Mysore is not only striving to emerge from the shadows of Bangalore on the industrial front but is also seeking to retain its distinct identity as a royal and heritage city. The facets which make Mysore attractive in the first place — well planned layouts, gardens, roads, wide footpaths, over 250 heritage structures and its easy way of life, spanning the tourism and yoga industries — have to be conserved. While people want development, they do not want Mysore to go the Bangalore way.
But amid this churning, Mysore is not only striving to emerge from the shadows of Bangalore on the industrial front but is also seeking to retain its distinct identity as a royal and heritage city. The facets which make Mysore attractive in the first place — well planned layouts, gardens, roads, wide footpaths, over 250 heritage structures and its easy way of life, spanning the tourism and yoga industries — have to be conserved. While people want development, they do not want Mysore to go the Bangalore way.
To preserve Mysore’s
reputation as a city with a blend of the traditional and the modern, activists
of Mysore are striving to take a leaf out of Bangalore’s experience — of
chaotic growth and unbridled urbanisation — and making efforts to stem the rot
before it gets out of hand. This perception — to learn from the follies of
other cities — is a sentiment being expressed by corporates as well.
The Confederation of
Indian Industry, in its road map for Mysore’s industrial development, calls for
a balance between preserving Mysore’s heritage value and speeding up the
industrial development. This was echoed by key speakers at a seminar on IT and
ITES and prospects for Mysore held recently. Kris Gopalakrishnan, immediate
past president, CII, and co-founder and non-executive vice-chairman, Infosys
Ltd., said people of Mysore should learn from the unplanned growth in other
cities and preserve everything that is good about living in Mysore.
R. Chandra Prakash, a
retired Professor of Commerce, University of Mysore, who has worked on urban
development issues, and Bhamy V. Shenoy, founder of Mysore Grahakara Parishat,
a citizens activist group, are crying hoarse on precisely the same issue.
Preserving the core
“We want to preserve and
vitalise the core heritage zone of Mysore comprising the Amba Vilas Palace,
Jaganmohan Palace, K.R. Circle, Dufferin Clock Tower, Town Hall and Devaraja
Market. This calls for notifying heritage regulations and dispersing commercial
activity to the periphery while pumping in resources to rejuvenate the core
area. Strangely, the Mysore Master Plan 2031 has equated the core heritage zone
with the central business district, which will only choke the area with traffic
and increase human density leading to urban decay which is already visible,”
Mr. Chandra Prakash says.
And with the concept of
town planning reduced to approving residential layouts and the emphasis on
functionality of buildings without any consideration for aesthetics to blend
the present with the past, the city’s landscape is set to alter beyond
recognition, compromising on its heritage value.
N.S. Rangaraju, a
retired Professor from the Department of Ancient History and Archaeology,
University of Mysore, who was also a member of the Heritage Sub-committee,
believes that the city’s heritage will decay if the heritage regulations framed
by the sub-committee was not notified. “It was submitted to the authorities two
years ago and will strengthen conservation efforts as a law will be in place to
protect them but the government is going slow on it.”
This is critical as
heritage in Mysore is linked to tourism and the city receives 3.5 million
visitors every year who keep the wheels of the local economy turning. C.G.
Bethsurmath, who is the Commissioner for Archaeology, Museums and Heritage,
said these guidelines had been submitted to the government and were in the
final stages of getting approval. But besides built heritage, the natural
landscapes like the Chamundi Hills and the city’s lakes — Kukkarahalli,
Lingambudhi, Karanji and Dalvoy — are bearing the brunt of urbanisation.
Time is fast running out
for Mysore to retain its heritage and way of life while on the development
curve. The city’s many intellectuals, its innumerable technical and management
institutes, software giants and educational institutions, now need to step up
as the elected representatives do not see any value in heritage conservation
unless it can be monetarily quantified.
No comments:
Post a Comment